All reviews examined showed variability in results in accordance with the variability of interventions and target populations. (3) Results: The reviews were published between 20, focusing on the use of different systems or technologies and aimed to analyze interventions on professionals, centers, or patients’ outcomes. ![]() After a meticulous screening, we identified 20 that met the inclusion criteria, and RHIS evaluation results were presented according to the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework. (2) Methods: We conducted an overview of systematics reviews and searched the literature in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases. ![]() (1) Background: The aim of this study is to provide a better understanding of the requirements to improve routine health information systems (RHISs) for the management of health systems, including the identification of best practices, opportunities, and challenges in the 53 countries and territories of the WHO European region.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |